O J Way Oren Rosenthal Austin,TX

Archiving Part II: What Makes Music Classic?

Posted in Music, The Arts by OJWay on July 17th, 2008 permalink

Note: This entry is the second part of a series of posts inspired by an amazing article called “The Last Verseby Burkhard Bilger from the April 28, 2008 edition of The New Yorker. It tells of two musicologists, Lance Ledbetter and Art Rosenbaum who are scouring the country for the last “old time” folk musicians, uninfluenced by recorded music that began spreading in the early 20th century.

Part 1 is available here.     

When we listen to classic music we often assume this is the greatest music in history and has withstood the test of time. But often the reason that particular music survives is because it was available to the right people at the right time. In every age, works of equal genius to the “classics” have been lost to history.

Johann Sebastian Bach

This almost happened to the music of Johann Sebastian Bach. After his death in 1750, Bach’s reputation declined. His work was hardly ever performed, and he was only known to a few devoted music historians. Granted those devotees were the “hip” crowd of the day, including Mozart and Beethoven, but his work was appreciated only by other musicians, and Bach remained unknown to the general public.

 

Portrait of Felix Mendelssohn The one who brought Bach back into the public eye was the composer Felix Mendelssohn. His great aunt Sarah had studied under Bach’s son, Wilhelm Friedemann Bach, so she had some old manuscripts. Mendelssohn took it upon himself to champion Bach’s work, and in 1829 he conducted the St. Matthew Passion in Berlin for the first time since Bach’s death. It must have been an incredible performance because it’s credited with restoring Bach’s reputation. We listen to Bach today because his old manuscripts turned up in the right place at the right time.

The Legend of Robert Johnson

Here’s a similar story about the great Mississippi bluesman Robert Johnson. When he died in 1938 he had only recorded 35 songs in two sessions in 1936 and 1937, and he sold maybe 5000 records. But one man who had heard of him was John Hammond. He was an impresario who had sought out Johnson in 1938 and eventually booked him for a show at Carnegie Hall in New York City. That might have been Johnson’s big break, but instead Johnson was poisoned in Clarksdale Mississippi by a lover’s jealous husband, and his great talent remained undiscovered.

 

Robert Johnson - King of the Delta BluesBut Hammond never forgot, and in 1961 he persuaded Columbia Records to issue an album cut from old 78s of Robert Johnson called “King of the Delta Blues Singers”. It didn’t sell very well at first, but a few hipsters caught on to the music early. Among those hipsters were Bob Dylan, Eric Clapton, the Rolling Stones, and Led Zeppelin. Now Robert Johnson is considered the greatest bluesman of his day, even though he hardly made it out of juke joints in Memphis and the Mississippi Delta.

 

Tommy Johnson - King of the Delta BluesInseperable from the story of Robert Johnson is the famous legend that Robert Johnson met with Satan at the crossroads and signed over his soul to play the blues and gain mastery of the guitar. Few people know that the same story used to be associated with another Mississippi bluesman named Tommy Johnson, who actually was considered the king of the Delta blues back when the two of them were alive. But once again, we listen to Robert Johnson today because his music turned up in the right place at the right time.

If you want to take a taste test, here are some samples of them both - Tommy Johnson here, Robert Johnson here. I’ll take Robert Johnson, but I’m alright with either of them. 

(more…)

Traditional Radio Is Dead

Posted in Technology by OJWay on June 28th, 2008 permalink

As part of my ongoing look at entrepreneurs championing new technologies, I sat down with Internet Radio Expert and entrepreneur Mark Lassoff, VP of Sales and Marketing at NLI Media Group, who heads up their Internet Broadcasting Group.

O J Way: What is Internet radio?

Mark LassoffML: Technically, Internet Radio is the distribution of audio entertainment or informational programming via the Internet. What makes it “radio” is that all of the listeners are hearing the same thing at the same time. That’s what’s known as a single feed, just like a traditional radio station. But of course, you hear different programs or content depending on the time you’re listening.

O J Way: So why is Internet radio better?

ML: The net effect is that Internet radio gives people options they never had with traditional station. People are tired of the same 10 stations playing the same music available in every market. Do you like reggae? There are Internet radio stations that format nothing but Marley. Opera fan? Several choices in Internet radio cater to your tastes.

O J Way: What will you find on Internet radio right now?

ML: Internet radio is about to undergo a major change.

Right now, many traditional radio stations simply rebroadcast their signal through Internet radio. Wrong answer! People aren’t looking for another channel of traditional commercial radio.

Another segment would be hobbyists and DJ wanna-be’s. The quality of a lot of these programs is low. These are vanity productions, but the lower costs of Internet radio can help this channel grow.

The new and, I believe, most important segment of Internet radio broadcasters is traditional advertisers who are developing their own content. Here’s the business opportunity: 57% of weekly Internet radio users report listening while purchasing goods at a website. So Internet radio reaches customers right when they’re at a place where they can make purchasing decisions – namely when they’re online.

O J Way: Who would choose to listen to ads? (more…)

100 Days, 100 Nights

Posted in Austin, Music by OJWay on June 25th, 2008 permalink

Here’s some music that caught my attention. Sharon Jones & The Dap-Kings are coming to the Austin City Limits Festival!

I love the way they paid such attention to details in this song and video. I could easily be fooled into thinking it’s vintage stuff from the 1960’s. 

www.Overnetworked

Posted in Technology by OJWay on June 8th, 2008 permalink

When I join an online community, how should I manage my network to make it work best for me? Do I want as many contacts as possible, or should I have a smaller network, composed only of people I know well and trust? It’s a fundamental argument about the merits of quality vs. quantity. The right answer depends on how deeply your computer usage is ingrained into your lifestyle.

 

Some people networ intimately. They share their schedules, their tastes in music, their pictures, and their profiles, and that’s also how they keep up with their friends.  These people may need to keep their online circle of friends in check. Others use the computer to communicate in a more superficial way. Even if they’re sending hundreds of e-mails and texts a day, they don’t reveal much. For these people, their network gets more effective as it gets larger.

 

Six Degrees of Kevin Bacon

  

Reihan Salam makes a case for “Quality” in an interesting piece he wrote for Slate on Facebook Etiquette called The Facebook Commandments

What should you do when someone you don’t like or don’t know sends you a friend request?

Most of you will hold your nose and accept the request. But why? This is like allowing a corsair-wielding pirate to board your vessel without a fight. Once you’ve accepted too many faux friends, Facebook becomes a real slog.

Reihan views Facebook as a vibrant online community, and not just a network. But I’m not a Facebook user. (More on that later.) I use LinkedIn, and I use it as a career resource to help me find people and be found. LinkedIn shows profile information on contacts within three degrees of separation, so having well-connected connections quickly broadens my world. I pretty much think that by now I’m three degrees away from everyone in Austin I’d want to meet. Zale Tabakman is a hardcore LinkedIn user, and he makes the case for “Quantity.” He should know; he himself has an extended LinkedIn network of 9 Million people.

 

Where’s The Middle Ground?  (more…)

What bug is this?

Posted in Austin by OJWay on June 2nd, 2008 permalink

Beautiful Big Big
Sitting on my front porch. It was very big, about 4″, and as you can see, quite beautiful. Anybody know what this is? Please tell me!

Archiving Part I: Maintaining Primary Source Information

Posted in Technology by OJWay on May 23rd, 2008 permalink

Appalachian Folk Singer Mary Lomax
Note: I’m dividing this post into parts one and two. The inspiration for this post is a New Yorker article called “The Last Verse” by Burkhard Bilger about musicologists making field recordings of lost blues artists in the Georgia mountains. Part II is available here.


The Digital Memory Crisis

The Information Age has made long-term archiving much more difficult. It’s ironic. At first glance it’s easier than ever to store documents on a flash drive, or Yahoo! Briefcase, or one-touch backup. But easy backup can leave people with a false sense of security because there are serious long-term hazards for stored digital information.

  1. Degradation of the storage media itself. Acidic paper and magnetic tape are the most obvious examples that come to mind, but did you know that even CD-Rs can be counted on to last only up to 5 years? For example, *reportedly* 10-20% of data from the Viking Missions to Mars is lost due to the degradation of the magnetic tape. (BTW, this has fueled conspiracy theories that NASA is suppressing information about life on Mars.) *I can’t find any authoritative confirmation of this fact though, so if you can find it please comment.*
  2. The obsolescence of media technologies often prevents the retrieval of digital information. As a vinyl record collector I know this phenomenon pretty darned well. A good example of this was the near-loss of data from the 1960 census that was stored in a format that could only be read by vintage UNIVAC tape drives. Good luck getting hold of one of those! It took several years to get that data back.

Taken together, the Council of Library and Information Resources calls this the Digital Memory Crisis. But there’s a third hazard as well:

  1. The needle in the haystack problem. The vast quantities of data being produced are often routinely backed up without regard to their long-term usefulness. The really useful stuff is saved alongside the dross of the information age, and the knowledge of where to find it may be forgotten after only a few days.

Way Back Machine

9-track take with protection ringSo let me reminisce about my days at Raytheon. I was working on a radar system, but it was already well along its development path. It had been commissioned in the mid-80s, but it called for technology that was “tried and true” even back then, and presumably bug-free. That had a lot of disadvantages, but a cool part was that I learned to use (more…)

Next Page »